Adjust Label 'Y' Position Based on Auto Height of Label Above

[Phineas]

I have Gallery1.

Gallery1 has Label1, Label2, Label3 stack on top of each other.

The Label2 'Auto height' is set to true.

I have tried Label3.Y +32 in Label3 'Y', and this works if there is a
single line of data in Label2. I have Label2 auto height on because
some of the content in Label2 may be two of three lines and I need
the Label2 height to adjust and accommodate the multiple lines.

All of this is working, except the Label3.Y is not adjusting to the
Label2 height when the label expands in height.

How do I write a formula that adjusts Label3 'Y' so that it adjusts
automatically based on the height of Label2?

[WarrenBelz · Accepted solution]

@Phineas ,

I hope this is a simple one - I would have thought that it would be

Label2.Y + Label2.Height

if Label2 AutoHeight is set to true.

Please click Accept as solution if my post helped you solve your issue. This will help others find it more readily. It also closes the item. If the content was useful in other ways, please consider giving it Thumbs Up.

MVP (Business Applications)   Visit my blog Practical Power Apps

[Phineas]

Hello, Warren; thank you for your assistance.

Is there a way to write the formula so that it adjust within each item.

Example.:

Gallery1 item 1 Label2 content is a single. In this item no adjustment of Label3 is necessary.

However, item 2 Label2 content is two lines, causing Label3 to adjust down.

Will your formula cause all items to adjust the Label3 'Y' because of item 2, or will each item adjust its Label3 independent of the other items?

[WarrenBelz]

@Phineas ,

Sorry, quite confused again - now you are bringing in Item you did not mention before. Quite simply you can apply that formula to the Y of anything you want adjusted to meet the bottom of the control above. It does not matter if either is fixed or auto height.

[Phineas]

Well, you know how I can be.🤣

My question was regarding how the formula would be applied across the entire gallery, and whether it would create unnecessary space by default where it isn't needed or desired.

I tested the formula using Subtitle2.Y + Subtitle2.Height +10.

It doesn't seem to be causing the unwanted spacing I feared.

I tried a similar formula early; it WAS causing the unwanted overlap.